McKenzie v. State
This text of 301 S.W.3d 571 (McKenzie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Dale McKenzie (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
301 S.W.3d 571, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1804, 2009 WL 4932740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenzie-v-state-moctapp-2009.