McKenzie v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

McKenzie v. State

301 S.W.3d 571, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1804, 2009 WL 4932740

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 22, 2009·No. ED 92642·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dale McKenzie (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dale McKenzie (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

McKenzie v. State, 301 S.W.3d 571, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1804, 2009 WL 4932740 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

301 S.W.3d 571 (McKenzie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.