McKenzie v. State
467 So. 2d 1056
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 28, 1985·No. No. 83-2067·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the order revoking probation on the basis of the valid grounds asserted, but strike those provisions involving appellant’s violations for failure to pay based upon the trial court’s failure to find an ability to pay. See Edwards v. State, 489 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Scherer v. State, 366 So.2d 840 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
Affirmed as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McKenzie v. State, 467 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
467 So. 2d 1056 (McKenzie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'BRIEN v. Ortiz
467 So. 2d 1056 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)