Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/McKenzie v. Smith

McKenzie v. Smith

95 S.E. 1000, 22 Ga. App. 300, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 316
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 15, 1918
Docket9085
StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 1000 (McKenzie v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKenzie v. Smith, 95 S.E. 1000, 22 Ga. App. 300, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 316 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Tlie former rulings of this court in this case (McKenzie v. Smith, 18 Ga. App. 626, 89 S. E. 1097), are controlling. The evidence did not change the status of the parties, and the accommodation indorser was discharged. The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Wade, O. J., mid Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKenzie v. Smith
89 S.E. 1097 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 1000, 22 Ga. App. 300, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenzie-v-smith-gactapp-1918.