McKenzie v. Ruth

22 Ohio St. (N.S.) 371
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1872·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

Held: In a proceeding In mandamus, the alternative writ must contain a statement of all the facts necessary to justify the order sought for by the. proceeding, and, on the hearing, omissions in the alternative writ can not be supplied by the affidavit, or application, on which it was allowed.

Peremptory writ refused.

Bloeksom § Andrews, for respondent.

No brief on file.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKenzie v. Ruth, 22 Ohio St. (N.S.) 371 (Ohio 1872).

22 Ohio St. (N.S.) 371 (McKenzie v. Ruth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.