McKenzie v. Robeson Health Care Corporation

E.D. North Carolina

McKenzie v. Robeson Health Care Corporation

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina

DecidedMarch 27, 2024

Docket7:23-cv-00979

StatusUnknown

This text of McKenzie v. Robeson Health Care Corporation (McKenzie v. Robeson Health Care Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKenzie v. Robeson Health Care Corporation, (E.D.N.C. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION JULIANNA LAURA MCKENZIE, Case No. 7:23-cv-00979-FL Plaintiff, v. NOTICE OF PENDING APPEAL ON ROBESON HEALTH CARE CORPORATION, DISPOSITIVE ISSUE AND MOTION TO RESERVE RULING Defendant. COMES NOW Defendant, Robeson Health Care Corporation (“RHCC”), by and through undersigned counsel, and submits this Notice of Pending Appeal on Dispositive Issue and Motion to Reserve Ruling, in which it respectfully requests that this Court reserve ruling on Defendant’s pending Motion to Dismiss and Substitute (ECF No. 14) until such time as the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued an opinion regarding the pending appeal of Ford v. Sandhills Med. Found., Inc., 4:21-cv-02307, 2022 WL 1810614, at *1 (D.S.C. June 2, 2022), on appeal, No. 22-2268 (4th Cir.) (oral argument held on Dec. 7, 2023). Before this Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Substitute (ECF No. 14), which requires this Court to determine whether Plaintiff’s claims fall within the scope of claims for which Defendant RHCC is entitled to FTCA coverage. Defendant’s Motion, Plaintiff’s Response, and the Government’s Statement of Interest (ECF No. 14, 18, 20), cite extensively to Ford v. Sandhills Med. Found., Inc.– one of only two cases addressing this issue within the Fourth Circuit. Ford v. Sandhills Med. Found., Inc. 4:21-cv-02307, 2022 WL 1810614 (D.S.C. June 2, 2022). Notably, the Court in Ford held, “[t]he alleged data breach arose out of Sandhills’s performance of medical or related functions within the scope of its employment as a deemed PHS employee. Thus, the Court will grant Sandhills’s motion to substitute.” Id. at *13-14.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION JULIANNA LAURA MCKENZIE, Case No. 7:23-cv-00979-FL Plaintiff, v. NOTICE OF PENDING APPEAL ON ROBESON HEALTH CARE CORPORATION, DISPOSITIVE ISSUE AND MOTION TO RESERVE RULING Defendant. COMES NOW Defendant, Robeson Health Care Corporation (“RHCC”), by and through undersigned counsel, and submits this Notice of Pending Appeal on Dispositive Issue and Motion to Reserve Ruling, in which it respectfully requests that this Court reserve ruling on Defendant’s pending Motion to Dismiss and Substitute (ECF No. 14) until such time as the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued an opinion regarding the pending appeal of Ford v. Sandhills Med. Found., Inc., 4:21-cv-02307, 2022 WL 1810614, at *1 (D.S.C. June 2, 2022), on appeal, No. 22-2268 (4th Cir.) (oral argument held on Dec. 7, 2023). Before this Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Substitute (ECF No. 14), which requires this Court to determine whether Plaintiff’s claims fall within the scope of claims for which Defendant RHCC is entitled to FTCA coverage. Defendant’s Motion, Plaintiff’s Response, and the Government’s Statement of Interest (ECF No. 14, 18, 20), cite extensively to Ford v. Sandhills Med. Found., Inc.– one of only two cases addressing this issue within the Fourth Circuit. Ford v. Sandhills Med. Found., Inc. 4:21-cv-02307, 2022 WL 1810614 (D.S.C. June 2, 2022). Notably, the Court in Ford held, “[t]he alleged data breach arose out of Sandhills’s performance of medical or related functions within the scope of its employment as a deemed PHS employee. Thus, the Court will grant Sandhills’s motion to substitute.” Id. at *13-14.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

McKenzie v. Robeson Health Care Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenzie-v-robeson-health-care-corporation-nced-2024.