McKenzie v. Pacific Health & Life Insurance
This text of 869 P.2d 859 (McKenzie v. Pacific Health & Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
review dismissed as improvidently allowed March 24, 1994
Max A. McKENZIE and Debra A. McKenzie, Respondents on Review, v. PACIFIC HEALTH & LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Oregon corporation, Petitioner on Review.
Martin E. Hansen, of Karnopp, Petersen, Noteboom, Hubei, Hansen & Arnett, Bend, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition were Howard G. Arnett and Brian L. Gingerich, Bend.
W. Eugene Hallman, of Mautz, Hallman, Pendleton, argued the cause and filed the response for respondents on review.
Bruce J. Brothers, of Brothers, Drew & Steelhammer, Bend, filed a brief amicus curiae on behalf of Oregon Trial Lawyers Association.
[477]*477Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette and Fadeley, Justices, would not have dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
869 P.2d 859, 318 Or. 476, 1994 Ore. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenzie-v-pacific-health-life-insurance-or-1994.