McKenzie v. McKenzie

648 So. 2d 326, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 315, 1995 WL 18392
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 20, 1995
DocketNo. 94-1062
StatusPublished

This text of 648 So. 2d 326 (McKenzie v. McKenzie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKenzie v. McKenzie, 648 So. 2d 326, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 315, 1995 WL 18392 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Under the circumstances of this case, the lower court should have permitted appellant to amend her answer to request rehabilita[327]*327tive alimony. Talbert v. Talbert, 364 So.2d 541 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Chaachou v. Chaachou, 118 So.2d 73, 76 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 122 So.2d 408 (Fla.1960).

REVERSED.

HARRIS, C.J., and PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chaachou v. Chaachou
118 So. 2d 73 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Talbert v. Talbert
364 So. 2d 541 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
648 So. 2d 326, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 315, 1995 WL 18392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenzie-v-mckenzie-fladistctapp-1995.