McKenzie v. McKenzie

648 So. 2d 326, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 315, 1995 WL 18392
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McKenzie v. McKenzie. Read the opinion of the Court — 672 So. 2d 48
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 1995·No. No. 94-1062·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Under the circumstances of this case, the lower court should have permitted appellant to amend her answer to request rehabilita[327]*327tive alimony. Talbert v. Talbert, 364 So.2d 541 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Chaachou v. Chaachou, 118 So.2d 73, 76 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 122 So.2d 408 (Fla.1960).

REVERSED.

HARRIS, C.J., and PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKenzie v. McKenzie, 648 So. 2d 326, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 315, 1995 WL 18392 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

648 So. 2d 326 (McKenzie v. McKenzie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chaachou v. Chaachou
118 So. 2d 73 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Talbert v. Talbert
364 So. 2d 541 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)