McKenzie v. Irving Trust Co.
This text of 271 A.D.2d 963 (McKenzie v. Irving Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think that defendant is entitled to any benefit that the judgment on the first cause of action may prove to be as a defense to the second cause of action, and that the defendant should be permitted to plead such judgment as a defense by way of a supplemental answer. We do not pass upon the efficacy of the defense in any respect. Order appealed from unanimonsly reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements-to the appellant, and the motion to strike the supplemental answer denied. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Peek, JJ. [See post, p. 1001.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 A.D.2d 963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenzie-v-irving-trust-co-nyappdiv-1947.