McKenzie v. Emanuel Farm Co.

129 S.E. 89, 160 Ga. 848, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 277
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 14, 1925·No. No. 4958·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hikes, J.

1. Conceding that the allegations of the petition make a case entitling the plaintiffs to the equitable relief prayed, these allegations are denied by the sworn answer of the defendants; and the evidence introduced upon the issue thus raised being in conflict, this court will not disturb the judgment of the trial judge denying a temporary injunction, it not being made to appear that there was an abuse of discretion. Bennett v. Dickey, 159 Ga. 267 (125 S. E. 455).

2. The issues of law and fact can all be threshed out upon the final hearing. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKenzie v. Emanuel Farm Co., 129 S.E. 89, 160 Ga. 848, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 277 (Ga. 1925).

129 S.E. 89 (McKenzie v. Emanuel Farm Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ballard v. Waites
21 S.E.2d 848 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)