McKenzie v. Downing
25 Ga. 669
Opinion
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
There was no delivery of the check to the payee or to any one else for him. It remained in the custody of the drawer It is presumed that he supposed it was sufficient to entitle the. [671] payee to the money, -on his death.' In that hé was mistaken, and however, mahífést his inténfi'on it cannot be carried out, consistently with a wise rule of law, which requires for the completion of a gift of this sort a; delivery of the thing-giveh;
Judgment affirmed;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McKenzie v. Downing, 25 Ga. 669 (Ga. 1858).
25 Ga. 669 (McKenzie v. Downing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southern Industrial Institute v. Marsh
15 F.2d 347 (Fifth Circuit, 1926)
Pennell v. Ennis
103 S.W. 147 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1907)
Sorrells v. Collins
36 S.E. 74 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)