McKenzie v. Davos Ski Resort, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McKenzie v. Davos Ski Resort, Inc.

17 A.D.2d 932, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7023

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 20, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 932 (McKenzie v. Davos Ski Resort, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKenzie v. Davos Ski Resort, Inc., 17 A.D.2d 932, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7023 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant perfects the appeal for the February 1963 Term of this court. Motion to dispense with printing granted only insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, but upon printed appellant’s points, upon condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record on the attorney for the respondent and files 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of the record on appeal and appellant’s printed points with this court. The appeal is to be perfected for the February 1963 Term of this court. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant perfects the appeal for the February 1963 Term of this court. Motion to dispense with printing granted only insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, but upon printed appellant’s points, upon condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record on the attorney for the respondent and files 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of the record on appeal and appellant’s printed points with this court. The appeal is to be perfected for the February 1963 Term of this court. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 932, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenzie-v-davos-ski-resort-inc-nyappdiv-1962.