McKenzie v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McKenzie v. Coombe

236 A.D.2d 652, 654 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 964

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 6, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Casey, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged with violating various prison disciplinary rules when a balloon containing heroin was found in his boot during a strip frisk. Following a disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of possessing a controlled substance and smuggling.* He commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination, which was transferred to this Court for review.

Petitioner argues, inter alia, that he was not provided with adequate employee assistance and that the Hearing Officer was biased. Initially, it is evident from our review of the hearing transcript that petitioner waived employee assistance at the time he was served with the misbehavior reports (see, Mat[653] ter of Wong v Coughlin, 138 AD2d 899, 901; see also, Matter of Mabry v Coughlin, 191 AD2d 892, 893). He explained at the hearing that he waived assistance because he had just been transferred to the correctional facility and did not know anyone. In view of this, petitioner may not now claim that he was denied adequate employee assistance. Moreover, we do not find, under the circumstances presented, that the Hearing Officer erred in denying petitioner’s request for assistance made later in the hearing. Likewise, we find that the Hearing Officer conducted the hearing in a fair and impartial manner and, therefore, reject petitioner’s claim of bias (see, Matter of Caban v Coombe, 233 AD2d 654; Matter of Kron v Coombe, 233 AD2d 641). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find that they are either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.

Crew III, J. P., Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Casey, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged with violating various prison disciplinary rules when a balloon containing heroin was found in his boot during a strip frisk. Following a disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of possessing a controlled substance and smuggling.* He commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination, which was transferred to this Court for review.

Petitioner argues, inter alia, that he was not provided with adequate employee assistance and that the Hearing Officer was biased. Initially, it is evident from our review of the hearing transcript that petitioner waived employee assistance at the time he was served with the misbehavior reports (see, Mat[653] ter of Wong v Coughlin, 138 AD2d 899, 901; see also, Matter of Mabry v Coughlin, 191 AD2d 892, 893). He explained at the hearing that he waived assistance because he had just been transferred to the correctional facility and did not know anyone. In view of this, petitioner may not now claim that he was denied adequate employee assistance. Moreover, we do not find, under the circumstances presented, that the Hearing Officer erred in denying petitioner’s request for assistance made later in the hearing. Likewise, we find that the Hearing Officer conducted the hearing in a fair and impartial manner and, therefore, reject petitioner’s claim of bias (see, Matter of Caban v Coombe, 233 AD2d 654; Matter of Kron v Coombe, 233 AD2d 641). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find that they are either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.

Crew III, J. P., Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Footnotes

McKenzie v. Coombe, 236 A.D.2d 652, 654 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 964 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

236 A.D.2d 652 (McKenzie v. Coombe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related