McKenzie v. City of Wheeling

Fourth Circuit

McKenzie v. City of Wheeling

332 F. App'x 99

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 24, 2009·No. No. 08-1787·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joyce McKenzie and William C. Reffitt appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McKenzie v. City of Wheeling, No. 5:07-cv-00148-FPS, 2008 WL 2434191 (N.D.W. Va. June 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument [100] because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joyce McKenzie and William C. Reffitt appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McKenzie v. City of Wheeling, No. 5:07-cv-00148-FPS, 2008 WL 2434191 (N.D.W. Va. June 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument [100] because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

McKenzie v. City of Wheeling, 332 F. App'x 99 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

332 F. App'x 99 (McKenzie v. City of Wheeling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.