McKenzie v. City of Gastonia
This text of 22 S.E.2d 712 (McKenzie v. City of Gastonia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Commission concluded that the accident relied upon as a basis for compensation did not arise out of and in the course of the employment of the deceased employee, and since such conclusion is warranted by the facts found by the Commission, which facts are sustained by the evidence, it must stand. Lockey v. Cohen, Goldman & Co., 213 N. C., 356, 196 S. E., 342.
The evidence is to the effect that the deceased employee, S. C. McKenzie, had obtained a leave of absence of a day or two from his duties as a policeman of the city of Gastonia, and was returning in his own automobile to the place from which he was required to start his work, the City Hall, when a collision with a police car of the city of Gastonia, recklessly driven, occurred, in which collision the deceased employee received injuries from which he died.
Since the evidence supports the finding that the deceased employee was returning to his duties from a leave of absence therefrom, the conclusion that he did not sustain injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment is sustained, and the Superior Court and this Court are bound by such conclusion of the Full Commission. Davis v. Mecklenburg County, 214 N. C., 469, 199 S. E., 604.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 S.E.2d 712, 222 N.C. 328, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenzie-v-city-of-gastonia-nc-1942.