McKenzie v. Chastain

Supreme Court of Georgia

McKenzie v. Chastain

184 S.E. 276, 181 Ga. 807, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 440

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 22, 1936

DocketNos. 10661, 10701, 10702

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 184 S.E. 276 (McKenzie v. Chastain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKenzie v. Chastain, 184 S.E. 276, 181 Ga. 807, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 440 (Ga. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, Justice.

These three eases were considered together. After a decision was rendered but while the cases were still pending on motion for rehearing, the parties entered into an agreement settling all of them, as is shown by statements of counsel on both sides, now on file with the record. The eases having thus become moot while pending in this court, it is ordered that the former judgments be vacated, that the opinion be withdrawn, and that the writs of error be

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Justice.

These three eases were considered together. After a decision was rendered but while the cases were still pending on motion for rehearing, the parties entered into an agreement settling all of them, as is shown by statements of counsel on both sides, now on file with the record. The eases having thus become moot while pending in this court, it is ordered that the former judgments be vacated, that the opinion be withdrawn, and that the writs of error be

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 S.E. 276, 181 Ga. 807, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenzie-v-chastain-ga-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack