McKenzie v. Board of County Commissioners

1955 NMSC 068, 286 P.2d 596, 59 N.M. 481
New Mexico Supreme Court·Decided August 8, 1955·No. No. 5988·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The question presented on appeal is whether conservancy districts as contemplated by Chapter 281, Laws 1955, for the purpose of election of a Board of Directors, shall be divided into five or six election precincts.

Considering the act as a whole, we are of the opinion that it was the true intent of the legislature that such conservancy districts be governed by a board consisting of five members and that the word “three” was intended to be used instead of the wiord “four” appearing in section 2 of said act. Compare Janney v. Fullroe, Inc., 47 N.M. 423, 144 P.2d 145; Asplund v. Alarid, 29 N.M. 129, 219 P. 786; Town of Clayton v. Colorado & S. Ry. Co., 10 Cir., 51 F.2d 977, 82 A.L.R. 417.

Accordingly, the judgment will be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

COMPTON, C. J., and LUJAN, SADLER, -McGHEE and KIKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKenzie v. Board of County Commissioners, 1955 NMSC 068, 286 P.2d 596, 59 N.M. 481 (N.M. 1955).

1955 NMSC 068 (McKenzie v. Board of County Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Town of Clayton v. Colorado &. S. Ry. Co.
51 F.2d 977 (Tenth Circuit, 1931)
Janney v. Fullroe, Inc.
144 P.2d 145 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1943)
Asplund v. Alarid
219 P. 786 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1923)