McKenzie v. . Ashe

2 N.C. 502
CourtSuperior Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 5, 1797
StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.C. 502 (McKenzie v. . Ashe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKenzie v. . Ashe, 2 N.C. 502 (N.C. Ct. App. 1797).

Opinion

Whatever the rules of racing decide in such a case should be the standard of decision now, the rule of law being that if he is entitled to the penalty by the rules of racing, he is so by law.

The jury were divided, and a juror withdrawn.

See McKenzie v. Ashe, 3 N.C. 161; Hunter v. Bynum, ibid., 354.

NOTE BY REPORTER. — Upon inquiry after the trial, several persons well experienced in racing gave it as their decided opinion that no accident whatever could exempt the defendant from forfeiture in case of failure, unless he had expressly provided against it by his agreement.

NOTE BY ANNOTATOR. — All bets were made illegal. Laws 1810, ch. 796, now C. S., 2142, 2143; Gooch v. Faucett. 122 N.C. 270.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 N.C. 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenzie-v-ashe-ncsuperct-1797.