McKenzie Trust Co. v. Bullard

127 S.E. 277, 159 Ga. 884, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 78
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 28, 1925·No. No. 4331·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

Properly construed, tlie petition and counter-petition constitute plain actions of law based on contract, and the remedies provided by law are adequate; for which reason it follows that equity has no jurisdiction, notwithstanding the waiver of discovery and the prayer for accounting, there being no facts alleged which show that resort to equity is necessary to secure an accounting-. It follows from the above ruling that this court is without jurisdiction to pass upon the assignments of error in the bill of exceptions sued out in this case, but that the Court of Appeals has such jurisdiction. It is ordered that the ease be transferred to the Court of Appeals. Burress v. Montgomery, 148 Ga. 548 (97 S. E. 538); Arthur Tufts Co. v. DeJarnette Supply Co., 158 Ga. 85 (123 S. E. 16).

All the Justices concur, except Russell, O. J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKenzie Trust Co. v. Bullard, 127 S.E. 277, 159 Ga. 884, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 78 (Ga. 1925).

127 S.E. 277 (McKenzie Trust Co. v. Bullard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gormley v. Slicer
172 S.E. 21 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
McKenzie Trust Co. v. Bullard
132 S.E. 125 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)