MCKENZIE, SHARLENE v. ONONDAGA COUNTY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 27, 2012·No. CA 11-01853·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

448 CA 11-01853 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

SHARLENE MCKENZIE, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF OSCAR MCKENZIE, JR., DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

ONONDAGA COUNTY AND ONONDAGA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION ASSIGNED COUNSEL PROGRAM, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

JEFFREY R. PARRY, SYRACUSE, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JONATHAN B. FELLOWS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John C. Cherundolo, A.J.), entered July 5, 2011. The order, among other things, granted the motion of defendants to dismiss the second through seventh causes of action.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs (see Roulan v County of Onondaga, 90 AD3d 1617; Cagnina v Onondaga County, 90 AD3d 1626; Matter of Parry v County of Onondaga, 51 AD3d 1385).

Entered: April 27, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MCKENZIE, SHARLENE v. ONONDAGA COUNTY, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

MCKENZIE, SHARLENE v. ONONDAGA COUNTY (MCKENZIE, SHARLENE v. ONONDAGA COUNTY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CAGNINA, CHRISTINA G. v. ONONDAGA COUNTY
90 A.D.3d 1626 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Parry v. County of Onondaga
51 A.D.3d 1385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Roulan v. County of Onondaga
90 A.D.3d 1617 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)