McKenny v. Gordon

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

McKenny v. Gordon

47 S.C.L. 40

DecidedMay 15, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 47 S.C.L. 40 (McKenny v. Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKenny v. Gordon, 47 S.C.L. 40 (S.C. Ct. App. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court, was delivered by

Johnstone, J.

There seems to be little doubt that the [41]*41certificate of one claiming to be, at the time, Chairman of the Court is, substantially, the certificate of the presiding Judge of the Court.

I am of opinion, therefore, that the authentication is a compliance with the Act of Congress; and that the motion should be refused, and the appeal dismissed, and it is so ordered.

O’Neall, C. J., and Wardlaw, J., concurred.

Motion dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court, was delivered by

Johnstone, J.

There seems to be little doubt that the [41]*41certificate of one claiming to be, at the time, Chairman of the Court is, substantially, the certificate of the presiding Judge of the Court.

I am of opinion, therefore, that the authentication is a compliance with the Act of Congress; and that the motion should be refused, and the appeal dismissed, and it is so ordered.

O’Neall, C. J., and Wardlaw, J., concurred.

Motion dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 S.C.L. 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenny-v-gordon-scctapp-1860.