McKenny v. Cockrum

Indiana Supreme Court

McKenny v. Cockrum

64 Ind. 596

DecidedNovember 15, 1878

StatusPublished

This text of 64 Ind. 596 (McKenny v. Cockrum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKenny v. Cockrum, 64 Ind. 596 (Ind. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Perkins, J.

The following is the assignment of error in this case: “The court below erred, in sustaining the motion of appellees and quashing the execution mentioned in the record.”

The question-presented on this appeal is the same as that decided in the case of The Vincennes National Bank v. Cockrum, ante, p. 229.

On the authority',of that case, the judgment in this is reversed, with costs; and the cause-remanded, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perkins, J.

The following is the assignment of error in this case: “The court below erred, in sustaining the motion of appellees and quashing the execution mentioned in the record.”

The question-presented on this appeal is the same as that decided in the case of The Vincennes National Bank v. Cockrum, ante, p. 229.

On the authority',of that case, the judgment in this is reversed, with costs; and the cause-remanded, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 Ind. 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenny-v-cockrum-ind-1878.