McKenney v. Fawcett

22 A. 86, 138 Pa. 344, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1285
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 10, 1890
DocketNo. 188
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 22 A. 86 (McKenney v. Fawcett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKenney v. Fawcett, 22 A. 86, 138 Pa. 344, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1285 (Pa. 1890).

Opinion

PER C UBI AM:

The only error assigned is that the court below refused to grant a new trial. That such refusal is not reYiewable here, is too well settled to need the citation of authority. “ Let us have peace.”

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weiskircher v. Connelly
100 A. 965 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Stern v. Johnston
38 Pa. Super. 1 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Stephens v. Gunzenhauser
27 Pa. Super. 417 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Smith v. Times Publishing Co.
36 A. 296 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 A. 86, 138 Pa. 344, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenney-v-fawcett-pa-1890.