McKenna v. State
This text of 493 S.W.2d 514 (McKenna v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
These are appeals from convictions in two felony theft cases, two possession of heroin cases, one possession of marihuana case and one possession of methamphetamine case. Trials were before the court on pleas of guilty and punishment was assessed at six years in each case.
Appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions, urging that his judicial confessions must be corroborated by additional evidence.
The written stipulations of evidence that appear in each of the six cases contain judicial confessions of all of the elements of the crime charged in the particular case. The stipulations are signed by appellant, sworn to before the district clerk and approved by appellant’s counsel and the court.
The judicial confessions of the appellant are sufficient to support the convictions under Article 1.15, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. East v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 476 S.W.2d 292; Ciulla v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 465 S.W.2d 150; Rose v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 465 S.W.2d 147; Waage v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 456 S.W.2d 388.
The judgments are affirmed.
Opinion approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
493 S.W.2d 514, 1972 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenna-v-state-texcrimapp-1972.