McKenna v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

McKenna v. State

322 S.E.2d 369, 171 Ga. App. 918, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2366

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 5, 1984

Docket66989

StatusPublished

This text of 322 S.E.2d 369 (McKenna v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKenna v. State, 322 S.E.2d 369, 171 Ga. App. 918, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2366 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

In McKenna v. State of Ga., 169 Ga. App. 319 (312 SE2d 380), this Court reversed the trial court order denying the respondent’s Motion to Dismiss an action under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act seeking upward modification of support and alimony while the respondent was complying with a prior judgment of a foreign court. In reversing the judgment of the trial court we relied, in part, on Bisno v. Biloon, 161 Ga. App. 351 (291 SE2d 66). On certiorari, the Supreme Court overruled, in part, Bisno, and reversed the judgment of this Court. Accordingly, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Sognier and Pope, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

In McKenna v. State of Ga., 169 Ga. App. 319 (312 SE2d 380), this Court reversed the trial court order denying the respondent’s Motion to Dismiss an action under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act seeking upward modification of support and alimony while the respondent was complying with a prior judgment of a foreign court. In reversing the judgment of the trial court we relied, in part, on Bisno v. Biloon, 161 Ga. App. 351 (291 SE2d 66). On certiorari, the Supreme Court overruled, in part, Bisno, and reversed the judgment of this Court. Accordingly, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Sognier and Pope, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

322 S.E.2d 369, 171 Ga. App. 918, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenna-v-state-gactapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack