McKenna v. Schatzel
This text of 272 A.D.2d 307 (McKenna v. Schatzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry, J.), dated May 10, 1999, which granted the plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant failed, as a matter of law, to rebut the presumption of negligence arising from his rear-end collision with the plaintiffs vehicle (see, Benyarko v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 162 AD2d 572, 573; Young v City of New York, 113 AD2d 833). Goldstein, J. P., Florio, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 A.D.2d 307, 707 N.Y.S.2d 357, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenna-v-schatzel-nyappdiv-2000.