McKenna v. McMichael
42 A. 14, 189 Pa. 440, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 664
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 3, 1899
DocketAppeal, No. 161
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 42 A. 14 (McKenna v. McMichael) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McKenna v. McMichael, 42 A. 14, 189 Pa. 440, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 664 (Pa. 1899).
Opinion
The learned court below was entirely correct in excluding the offers to prove the contents of the alleged second will. There was no sufficient proof of the execution of that will, and hence its contents could not be given in evidence. The reasons for the rulings of the court are sufficiently set forth in the opinion on the motion for a new trial and need not be repeated.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gray Will
76 A.2d 169 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1950)
Burtt Will
44 A.2d 670 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)
Tinnan v. Fitzpatrick
87 A. 802 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1913)
Michell v. Low
63 A. 246 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Estate of Johnson
2 Coffey 425 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1903)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
42 A. 14, 189 Pa. 440, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenna-v-mcmichael-pa-1899.