McKenna v. McKenna
This text of 6 R.I. Dec. 92 (McKenna v. McKenna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Heard upon motion to modify decree of November 9, 1928, under which respondent was ordered to pay $23 a week to petitioner. Since 1928 the respondent has not been in good health and recently his receipts as a physician have fallen off, and at times it has become necessary to borrow money to pay the allowance.
The Court can not see how at the present time it is possible for respondent to pay more than fifteen dollars per week.
An order may be entered modifying the decree of November 9, 1928, in accordance herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 R.I. Dec. 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenna-v-mckenna-risuperct-1930.