McKenna v. McKenna

Supreme Court of New Jersey

McKenna v. McKenna

96 A. 890, 84 N.J. Eq. 190, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 396

DecidedJanuary 27, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 96 A. 890 (McKenna v. McKenna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKenna v. McKenna, 96 A. 890, 84 N.J. Eq. 190, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 396 (N.J. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion hied in the court below by Advisory Master Rosenberg.

[193]*193For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Terhune, Heppenheimer-12. For reversal — Swayze, White, Williams — 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A. 890, 84 N.J. Eq. 190, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenna-v-mckenna-nj-1915.