McKenna v. McGoldrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McKenna v. McGoldrick

262 A.D. 702, 27 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5464

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 2, 1941·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think that $3,500 is reasonable compensation for the services performed by the claimants if due consideration be given to the results achieved and the amount involved in the proceedings as indicated by the mortality tables, of which we may take judicial notice.

The order should be modified accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, with costs and disbursements to the appellants.

Present — O’Malley, Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Order unanimously modified in accordance with opinion, and as so modified affirmed, with costs and disbursements to the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We think that $3,500 is reasonable compensation for the services performed by the claimants if due consideration be given to the results achieved and the amount involved in the proceedings as indicated by the mortality tables, of which we may take judicial notice.

The order should be modified accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, with costs and disbursements to the appellants.

Present — O’Malley, Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Order unanimously modified in accordance with opinion, and as so modified affirmed, with costs and disbursements to the appellants.

McKenna v. McGoldrick, 262 A.D. 702, 27 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5464 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

262 A.D. 702 (McKenna v. McGoldrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.