McKenna v. McGoldrick

262 A.D. 702, 27 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5464

This text of 262 A.D. 702 (McKenna v. McGoldrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKenna v. McGoldrick, 262 A.D. 702, 27 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5464 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think that $3,500 is reasonable compensation for the services performed by the claimants if due consideration be given to the results achieved and the amount involved in the proceedings as indicated by the mortality tables, of which we may take judicial notice.

The order should be modified accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, with costs and disbursements to the appellants.

Present — O’Malley, Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Order unanimously modified in accordance with opinion, and as so modified affirmed, with costs and disbursements to the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D. 702, 27 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenna-v-mcgoldrick-nyappdiv-1941.