McKenna v. McDonald
10 A.2d 210, 111 Vt. 64, 1940 Vt. LEXIS 118
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McKenna v. McDonald. Read the opinion of the Court — 111 Vt. 60 →
Opinion
The plaintiff was a passenger in the automobile of Charles F. McKenna, and was involved in the accident described in McKenna v. McDonald, ante, p. 60, 10 Atl. 2d. 208. The two actions were tried together below, and argued together here. The facts and legal principles involved are sufficiently similar to make the result the same in each cause.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McKenna v. McDonald, 10 A.2d 210, 111 Vt. 64, 1940 Vt. LEXIS 118 (Vt. 1940).
10 A.2d 210 (McKenna v. McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.