McKenna v. Lee

Fourth Circuit

McKenna v. Lee

53 F. App'x 268

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 20, 2002·No. No. 02-1790·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Edward Martin McKenna, Sr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Appellees and denying relief on his copyright infringement action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McKenna v. Lee, No. CA-00-911-BR (E.D.N.C. July 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Edward Martin McKenna, Sr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Appellees and denying relief on his copyright infringement action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McKenna v. Lee, No. CA-00-911-BR (E.D.N.C. July 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

McKenna v. Lee, 53 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

53 F. App'x 268 (McKenna v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related