McKenna v. Industrial Acc. Com.
This text of 215 P. 900 (McKenna v. Industrial Acc. Com.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner, Matthew McKenna, was denied relief by the respondents under the workmen's compensation law (Stats. 1917, p. 831) because they found that petitioner had suffered no injury as a result of the alleged accident, and that the injury he complained of resulted from a previous accident.
[1] The petitioner claims that the respondent board was without jurisdiction because the accident complained of *Page 234 comes within the admiralty jurisdiction of the federal courts. If this is true, the petitioner is not injured by the fact that the respondent board found against him. If they have jurisdiction he is concluded by their finding. Not having shown any injury by the order complained of petitioner is not entitled to a writ.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
215 P. 900, 191 Cal. 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenna-v-industrial-acc-com-cal-1923.