McKenna v. . East River Ferry Company
21 N.E. 413, 113 N.Y. 636, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1015
This text of 21 N.E. 413 (McKenna v. . East River Ferry Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McKenna v. . East River Ferry Company, 21 N.E. 413, 113 N.Y. 636, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1015 (N.Y. 1889).
Opinion
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Ruger, Ch. J., Andrews and Danforth,. JJ., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
21 N.E. 413, 113 N.Y. 636, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenna-v-east-river-ferry-company-ny-1889.