McKenna v. . Bolger
22 N.E. 1132, 117 N.Y. 651, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1525
Opinion
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Peckham, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McKenna v. . Bolger, 22 N.E. 1132, 117 N.Y. 651, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1525 (N.Y. 1889).
22 N.E. 1132 (McKenna v. . Bolger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Werring v. Selig
241 A.D. 67 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Royall v. Holloway
299 S.W. 862 (Texas Supreme Court, 1927)