McKenna v. Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co.

40 So. 426, 87 Miss. 652
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1905·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

Caljeioon, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is nothing in the evidence of any negligence in the operation of the gate beams, as in Feeney v. Railroad Co., 116 N. Y., 375 (22 N. E. Rep., 402; 5 L. R. A., 544). The showing of plaintiff is that she was struck by the beam in its descent as she was walking out in broad daylight, and her witness testifies that any person would see it, walking as the average person would. This is not a case of injury by railroad rolling stock, where negligence is presumed, and the damage here might well consist with proper care on the part of the operators of the gate.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKenna v. Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co., 40 So. 426, 87 Miss. 652 (Mich. 1905).

40 So. 426 (McKenna v. Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Feiler v. Rosenbloom
416 A.2d 1345 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1980)
Redd and Hill v. L & a Contracting Co.
151 So. 2d 205 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1963)
Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. Friedhof
90 So. 182 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1921)
Corinth, Shiloh & Savannah Turnpike Co. v. Gooch
73 So. 869 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1916)