McKenna v. Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co.

40 So. 426, 87 Miss. 652
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 40 So. 426 (McKenna v. Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKenna v. Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co., 40 So. 426, 87 Miss. 652 (Mich. 1905).

Opinions

Caljeioon, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is nothing in the evidence of any negligence in the operation of the gate beams, as in Feeney v. Railroad Co., 116 N. Y., 375 (22 N. E. Rep., 402; 5 L. R. A., 544). The showing of plaintiff is that she was struck by the beam in its descent as she was walking out in broad daylight, and her witness testifies that any person would see it, walking as the average person would. This is not a case of injury by railroad rolling stock, where negligence is presumed, and the damage here might well consist with proper care on the part of the operators of the gate.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Feiler v. Rosenbloom
416 A.2d 1345 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1980)
Redd and Hill v. L & a Contracting Co.
151 So. 2d 205 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1963)
Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. Friedhof
90 So. 182 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1921)
Corinth, Shiloh & Savannah Turnpike Co. v. Gooch
73 So. 869 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 So. 426, 87 Miss. 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenna-v-alabama-vicksburg-railway-co-miss-1905.