McKelvin v. State

87 S.E. 150, 17 Ga. App. 413, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 467
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 9, 1915·No. 6922·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. An assignment of error upon the ground that the verdict rendered was contrary to the charge of the court is equivalent to a complaint that the verdict was contrary to law; and such an exception “does not present for decision any legal question.” Napier v. Burkett, 113 Ga. 607 (38 S. E. 941); Wight v. Schmidt, 111 Ga. 858 (36 S. E. 937); Roberts v. Keeler, 111 Ga. 184-6 (36 S. E. 617).

2. The instructions complained of are not erroneous for any of the reasons assigned.

3. There is no merit in any of the other special assignments of error.

4. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Russell, O. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKelvin v. State, 87 S.E. 150, 17 Ga. App. 413, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 467 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

87 S.E. 150 (McKelvin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hightower v. Landrum
136 S.E.2d 425 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Lee v. Texas Co.
153 S.E. 379 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Hunt v. State
144 S.E. 148 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Orr v. State
99 S.E. 892 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Empire Cotton Oil Co. v. Continental Gin Co.
93 S.E. 525 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Ellis v. Riley
90 S.E. 724 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Wakefield v. Lee
90 S.E. 224 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)