McKelly v. Goertzen
This text of 54 F. App'x 488 (McKelly v. Goertzen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Michael Lee McKelly appeals pro se the district court’s entry of judgment following a jury verdict [489]*489for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force during his 1999 arrest. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We affirm the district court’s judgment because neither of the rules McKelly cites on appeal would establish a basis for reversal in any event due to jury misconduct. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 403 and 609.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 F. App'x 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckelly-v-goertzen-ca9-2003.