McKellar v. Lamkin

22 Tex. 244
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 22 Tex. 244 (McKellar v. Lamkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKellar v. Lamkin, 22 Tex. 244 (Tex. 1858).

Opinion

Roberts, J.

One of the defendants in error filed a plea in abatement, that he had not been served with a correct copy of the citation and copy of petition. Defendants below failing to appear when the cause was called, the court rendered judgment by default. It is contended, that, the plea having been filed, the court could not legally render a judgment by default.

It was the duty of the defendant, who had filed the plea, to be present to have the issue submitted, and support it with affirmative proof. It was not the business of the court to do it for him. (Hopkins v. Donaho, 4 Tex. Rep. 336.)

But the judgment is largely excessive, and must be reversed, and rendered for the correct amount.

Reversed and reformed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Auds Creek Oil Co. v. Brooks Supply Co.
221 S.W. 319 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1920)
London Assurance Corp. v. T. H. Lee & Co.
18 S.W. 508 (Texas Supreme Court, 1886)
Adams v. Duggan
1 White & W. 736 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Tex. 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckellar-v-lamkin-tex-1858.