McKELIVER v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McKELIVER v. State

45 So. 3d 934, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15550, 2010 WL 3984703

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 13, 2010

Docket4D09-4042

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 45 So. 3d 934 (McKELIVER v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKELIVER v. State, 45 So. 3d 934, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15550, 2010 WL 3984703 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

*935 PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, we have reviewed the record and appellant’s pro se brief. We grant appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the convictions and sentences except to the extent that we remand with directions that the trial court correct a scrivener’s error in the written sentencing order for count IV to reflect the “30” days orally pronounced instead of “3” days. See Gallardo v. State, 991 So.2d 997, 998 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (noting that written sentence must be corrected to reflect trial court’s unambiguous oral pronouncement).

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

GROSS, C.J., FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*935 PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, we have reviewed the record and appellant’s pro se brief. We grant appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the convictions and sentences except to the extent that we remand with directions that the trial court correct a scrivener’s error in the written sentencing order for count IV to reflect the “30” days orally pronounced instead of “3” days. See Gallardo v. State, 991 So.2d 997, 998 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (noting that written sentence must be corrected to reflect trial court’s unambiguous oral pronouncement).

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

GROSS, C.J., FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 So. 3d 934, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15550, 2010 WL 3984703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckeliver-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack