McKeever v. Fontenot

25 F. Supp. 366, 22 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 192, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1635
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana
DecidedSeptember 19, 1938
DocketNos. 834, 835, 1160
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 25 F. Supp. 366 (McKeever v. Fontenot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKeever v. Fontenot, 25 F. Supp. 366, 22 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 192, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1635 (E.D. La. 1938).

Opinion

BORAH, District Judge.

Plaintiffs herein are the former and present owners and operators of an oil refinery which is,located on the Mississippi river at Destrehan, Louisiana. They are in these actions seeking to recover the back [367]*367pipe line transportation taxes which were assessed and collected by the defendant pursuant to Section 731 of the Revenue Act of 1932, as amended, 26 U.S.C.A. § 1420 et seq. note, upon the ground that the movement of refined liquid products of petroleum from the refinery storage tanks through pump houses and pipe lines to vessels at the wharf at the refinery site does not constitute transportation of petroleum and its products by pipe line within the meaning of that section and Treasury Regulations 42, Art. 26. By written stipulation the parties agreed to waive a trial by jury and further agreed that these actions should be consolidated and tried and determined on the issue of law raised by the following agreed statement of facts and such further evidence not in conflict therewith as may be introduced by any party:

1. E. G. McKeever and A. E. Ralston, plaintiffs in the first above action, are duly appointed, qualified and acting liquidators of the Mexican Petroleum Corporation of Louisiana, Inc., a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Louisiana, and now in liquidation pursuant to a consent to dissolution executed conformably to the law of the State of Louisiana.

2. Pan American Petroleum Corporation, plaintiff in the second and third above actions is and at all times mentioned in said actions was a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of- Delaware and is and at all times mentioned in said actions was duly authorized to transact business in the State of Louisiana.

3. Rufus W. Fontenot, defendant herein, was from June 19, 1934, until February 7, 1938, the Acting Collector of Internal Revenue of the United States for the District of Louisiana, and has been since February 7, 1938, the Collector of Internal Revenue of the United States for the District of Louisiana. He is a citizen and resident of the City of New Orleans, Louisiana.

4. From on or about February 9, 1918, until on or about August 31, 1934, the Mexican Petroleum Corporation of Louisiana, Inc., hereinafter called Mex Pet, owned and operated a petroleum refinery located on the Mississippi River at Destrehan, Louisiana.

5. On or about August 31, 1934, Pan American Petroleum Corporation, hereinafter called Pan Am, acquired said refinery from Mex Pet and thereafter at all times material it owned and operated said refinery.

The land upon which this refinery was situated was owned by Mex Pet and thereafter by Pan Am.

6. The taxpayer (which term means Mex Pet until August 31, 1934, and Pan Am thereafter) also owned and maintained various storage tanks situated on the aforesaid premises wherein it stored crude petroleum and the liquid products thereof as a part of the operation of said refinery.

7. The refinery site occupied a plot of land in an unbroken parcel located at Destrehan on the Mississippi River and the tax payer owned and maintained a wharf situated on its property on the banks of the Mississippi River at which vessels docked and discharged and were loaded with the liquid products of crude petroleum.

8. The aforesaid storage tanks were connected to one or all of four pump houses by various stationary pipelines owned by the tax payer. The pump houses were connected to the wharf by various stationary pipelines owned by the tax payer. The-lines herein referred to vary in diameter from six to twelve inches.

Attached hereto marked Exhibit “A”1 is a map of the refinery premises. The markings upon said map correspond to the markings hereinafter referred to.

(A) The following are the approximate distances via pipe lines:

I. Pump House “A” to the wharf 2200 feet.

II. Pump House “B” to the wharf 2600 feet.

III. Pump House “C” to the wharf 2700 feet.

IV. Pump House “C” to the loading rack “E” 550 feet.

V. Tanks 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 and 50 to the wharf 4200 feet.

VI. Tanks 202 through 221 to the wharf 5500 feet.

VII. Tanks 4 through 16 to the wharf 3600 feet. All tanks mentioned above are storage tanks.

(B) All crude oil brought into the plant comes through pipelines from the wharf into various storage tanks. No crude oil is shipped out from the refinery. All outward movements are of refined products. The pipe lines for the inward movement of [368]*368the crude and the pipe lines for the outward movement of refined products are laid side by side out to the wharf.

(C) Crude oil brought into the plant is first placed in a crude oil storage tank, from whence it is brought to the topping plant for the various cuts to be taken off. After this first operation, the products are transferred through the main pump house again to tanks containing untreated products. From such untreated tanks the products are moved to the treating plant and then into treated tanks. In some cases, or for certain products, they are brought back again to the asphalt tanks for making the cut-backs. Some of the products are shipped directly in tank cars from the loading racks and some off the wharf to barges or steamers. The inward movement of the crude petroleum from vessels at the wharf into the refinery was taxed originally, but the tax was refunded. The only movement taxed, other than as just stated, was that from the storage tanks through the pump houses to the vessels at the wharf.

(D) Petroleum, in course of refining, may pass several times through the pump houses. About 16% of all the petroleum and its products handled through the intramural lines is moved over the wharf to vessels.

(E) The pump houses used in connection with the tank car loading rack and the pump houses used in connection with the movement out to the wharf are, identical, and the kind and type of pipe in the movement is also identical. Asphalt, gasoline, kerosene, or fuel oil are pumped from the particular storage tanks through the pump house into the tank car which may be anywhere from 100 feet to a mile from the particular storage tank. In the case of asphalt, the tanks are close to the loading rack, but in the other cases the tanks are the distance mentioned away.

(F) The refinery does not have any canning facilities for gasoline, kerosene or fuel oil and the delivery of refined products in bulk either to tank cars or vessels is the only method of delivery at the refinery.

(G) The products moved .over the wharf to vessels are gasoline, asphalt, kerosene or other refined products. In the filling of orders, usually the Refinery Superintendent designates the particular storage tank from which the refined product is to be withdrawn and instructions are given by him to send the specified quantity out to the wharf.

9. The pipelines aforesaid are located wholly upon the tax payer’s property. The Jefferson Highway, - which is thirty feet wide, traverses the property. There is a levee on said property abutting the Mississippi River about ninety feet wide.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKeever v. Fontenot
104 F.2d 326 (Fifth Circuit, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F. Supp. 366, 22 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 192, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckeever-v-fontenot-laed-1938.