McKeever v. Barr

Supreme Court

McKeever v. Barr

140 S. Ct. 597, 205 L. Ed. 2d 529

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 21, 2020

Docket19-307

StatusRelating-to

Cited by4 cases

This text of 140 S. Ct. 597 (McKeever v. Barr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKeever v. Barr, 140 S. Ct. 597, 205 L. Ed. 2d 529 (U.S. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

Statement of Justice BREYER respecting the denial of certiorari.

In the decision below, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that a district court could not authorize *598 the release of grand jury information except as specifically enumerated in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). 920 F.3d 842 , 850 (2019). That decision is in conflict with the decisions of several other Circuits, which have indicated that district courts retain inherent authority to release grand jury material in other appropriate cases. See, e.g., Carlson v. United States , 837 F.3d 753 , 766-767 (C.A.7 2016) ; In re Craig , 131 F.3d 99 , 105 (C.A.2 1997) ; In re Hastings , 735 F.2d 1261 , 1271-1272 (C.A.11 1984). It also appears to conflict with the considered views of the Rules Committee. See Advisory Committee Minutes on Crim. Rules 7 (Apr. 22-23 2012), https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/fr_import/criminal-min-04-2012.pdf.

Whether district courts retain authority to release grand jury material outside those situations specifically enumerated in the Rules, or in situations like this, is an important question. It is one I think the Rules Committee both can and should revisit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Statement of Justice BREYER respecting the denial of certiorari.

In the decision below, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that a district court could not authorize *598 the release of grand jury information except as specifically enumerated in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). 920 F.3d 842 , 850 (2019). That decision is in conflict with the decisions of several other Circuits, which have indicated that district courts retain inherent authority to release grand jury material in other appropriate cases. See, e.g., Carlson v. United States , 837 F.3d 753 , 766-767 (C.A.7 2016) ; In re Craig , 131 F.3d 99 , 105 (C.A.2 1997) ; In re Hastings , 735 F.2d 1261 , 1271-1272 (C.A.11 1984). It also appears to conflict with the considered views of the Rules Committee. See Advisory Committee Minutes on Crim. Rules 7 (Apr. 22-23 2012), https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/fr_import/criminal-min-04-2012.pdf.

Whether district courts retain authority to release grand jury material outside those situations specifically enumerated in the Rules, or in situations like this, is an important question. It is one I think the Rules Committee both can and should revisit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 S. Ct. 597, 205 L. Ed. 2d 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckeever-v-barr-scotus-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack