McKeesport v. Pittsburgh, McKeesport & Connellsville Ry. Co.

86 A. 484, 238 Pa. 591, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 1016
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 6, 1913
DocketAppeal, No. 83
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 86 A. 484 (McKeesport v. Pittsburgh, McKeesport & Connellsville Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKeesport v. Pittsburgh, McKeesport & Connellsville Ry. Co., 86 A. 484, 238 Pa. 591, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 1016 (Pa. 1913).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Frazer making absolute the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Philadelphia v. Holmes Electric Protective Co.
6 A.2d 884 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Philadelphia v. Holmes Electric Protective Co.
33 Pa. D. & C. 187 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 A. 484, 238 Pa. 591, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 1016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckeesport-v-pittsburgh-mckeesport-connellsville-ry-co-pa-1913.