McKeesport v. Pittsburgh, McKeesport & Connellsville Ry. Co.
86 A. 484, 238 Pa. 591, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 1016
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Frazer making absolute the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McKeesport v. Pittsburgh, McKeesport & Connellsville Ry. Co., 86 A. 484, 238 Pa. 591, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 1016 (Pa. 1913).
86 A. 484 (McKeesport v. Pittsburgh, McKeesport & Connellsville Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Philadelphia v. Holmes Electric Protective Co.
6 A.2d 884 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Philadelphia v. Holmes Electric Protective Co.
33 Pa. D. & C. 187 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1938)