McKee v. Wellington Estates, Ltd.

94 A.D.2d 686, 463 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18104
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 24, 1983·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lee Price, J.), entered July 6, 1982 denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint and plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment, and declaring in favor of plaintiff, is unanimously reversed, on the law, and defendants’ motion to dismiss the first cause of action under CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) for failure to state a cause of action is granted, with costs to defendants. In our view, there is no obligation on the landlord under subdivision 2 of section 7-103 of the General Obligations Law to apply accrued interest on the tenant’s security deposit toward an increase in the security deposit when new leases are entered into at higher rents. The landlord in the present case has complied with the obligations of the statute by annually paying the interest (less appropriate administrative expenses) to the tenant. The landlord does not press its appeal insofar as it relates to the second cause of action. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Silverman, Lynch, Milonas and Alexander, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKee v. Wellington Estates, Ltd., 94 A.D.2d 686, 463 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18104 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

94 A.D.2d 686 (McKee v. Wellington Estates, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mancini v. DMJ Management Corp.
195 Misc. 2d 656 (Mount Vernon City Court, 2003)