McKee v. Walker

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 10, 2004
Docket04-7221
StatusUnpublished

This text of McKee v. Walker (McKee v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKee v. Walker, (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7221

DAVID MCKEE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OFFICER WALKER; ARLINGTON COUNTY JAIL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-86)

Submitted: November 4, 2004 Decided: November 10, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David McKee, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

David McKee appeals the district court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See McKee v. Walker, No.

CA-04-86 (E.D. Va. July 16, 2004). We deny McKee’s motion for

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McKee v. Walker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckee-v-walker-ca4-2004.