McKee v. Walker
This text of McKee v. Walker (McKee v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7221
DAVID MCKEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
OFFICER WALKER; ARLINGTON COUNTY JAIL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-86)
Submitted: November 4, 2004 Decided: November 10, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David McKee, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
David McKee appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See McKee v. Walker, No.
CA-04-86 (E.D. Va. July 16, 2004). We deny McKee’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McKee v. Walker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckee-v-walker-ca4-2004.