McKee v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McKee v. State

1928 OK CR 196, 267 P. 681, 40 Okla. Crim. 148, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 148

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 26, 1928

DocketNo. A-6457.

StatusPublished

This text of 1928 OK CR 196 (McKee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKee v. State, 1928 OK CR 196, 267 P. 681, 40 Okla. Crim. 148, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 148 (Okla. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Walter McKee, was tried and convicted and his punishment fixed at a fine of $150 and confinement in the county jail for 30 days on an information charging that he did have in his possession one-half gallon of whisky with the unlaw *149 ful intent to sell the same. From the judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court a petition in error with case-made.

No brief has been filed and no appearance made in behalf of plaintiff in error in this court. The errors assigned question the sufficiency of the information and the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.

The information is sufficient and an examination of the record fails to disclose any error in the admission or rejection of evidence or in the instructions given to the jury, and the evidence is clearly sufficient to sustain the verdict.

The judgment of the lower court is accordingly affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Walter McKee, was tried and convicted and his punishment fixed at a fine of $150 and confinement in the county jail for 30 days on an information charging that he did have in his possession one-half gallon of whisky with the unlaw *149 ful intent to sell the same. From the judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court a petition in error with case-made.

No brief has been filed and no appearance made in behalf of plaintiff in error in this court. The errors assigned question the sufficiency of the information and the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.

The information is sufficient and an examination of the record fails to disclose any error in the admission or rejection of evidence or in the instructions given to the jury, and the evidence is clearly sufficient to sustain the verdict.

The judgment of the lower court is accordingly affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1928 OK CR 196, 267 P. 681, 40 Okla. Crim. 148, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckee-v-state-oklacrimapp-1928.