McKee v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

McKee v. State

294 S.E.2d 689, 163 Ga. App. 430, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2519

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 10, 1982

Docket64187

StatusPublished

This text of 294 S.E.2d 689 (McKee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKee v. State, 294 S.E.2d 689, 163 Ga. App. 430, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2519 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Carley, Judge.

Appellant, with two co-defendants, was indicted, tried and convicted of secreting property to defraud another. Code Ann. § 26-1504. The instant appeal is a companion case to Jarrett v. State, 161 Ga. App. 285 (287 SE2d 746) (1982).

Appellant enumerates as error the denial of his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal. “The State, in the prosecution of the defendants, sought to establish a conspiracy . . . The jury was authorized to find that the [appellant], acting in concert with the other defendants, secreted the property in question. We find the [431]*431proof in the case sub judice to be sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the [appellant] guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” Jarrett, 161 Ga. App. at 285-286, supra.

Decided September 10, 1982. Hulon Murray, for appellant. Jeff C. Wayne, District Attorney, Bruce L. Udolf, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J., and Shulman, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carley, Judge.

Appellant, with two co-defendants, was indicted, tried and convicted of secreting property to defraud another. Code Ann. § 26-1504. The instant appeal is a companion case to Jarrett v. State, 161 Ga. App. 285 (287 SE2d 746) (1982).

Appellant enumerates as error the denial of his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal. “The State, in the prosecution of the defendants, sought to establish a conspiracy . . . The jury was authorized to find that the [appellant], acting in concert with the other defendants, secreted the property in question. We find the [431]*431proof in the case sub judice to be sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the [appellant] guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” Jarrett, 161 Ga. App. at 285-286, supra.

Decided September 10, 1982. Hulon Murray, for appellant. Jeff C. Wayne, District Attorney, Bruce L. Udolf, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J., and Shulman, P. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 S.E.2d 689, 163 Ga. App. 430, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckee-v-state-gactapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack