McKee v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

McKee v. State

107 So. 224, 21 Ala. App. 259, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 53

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 9, 1926

Docket8 Div. 353.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 107 So. 224 (McKee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKee v. State, 107 So. 224, 21 Ala. App. 259, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 53 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense denounced by section 3212 of the Code of 1923.. The prosecution was begun in the inferior court of Athens, Ala., and, from his conviction there, defendant appealed to the circuit court of Limestone county. In that court the solicitor did not “make a brief statement of the cause of complaint, signed by him, etc.” (Code 1923, § 3843), and, it not appearing that this was waived, it was error to place the defendant upon trial in the circuit Court without it; Perry v. State, 81 So. 858, 17 Ala. App. 80, and cases therein cited.

We do not think it was error to overrule appellant’s motion for a new trial on any of the grounds therein set forth. This will sufficiently indicate the views of the court to render it unnecessary to pass upon the other questions presented,, which, indeed, may not arise upon another trial. For the error *260 pointed ont, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense denounced by section 3212 of the Code of 1923.. The prosecution was begun in the inferior court of Athens, Ala., and, from his conviction there, defendant appealed to the circuit court of Limestone county. In that court the solicitor did not “make a brief statement of the cause of complaint, signed by him, etc.” (Code 1923, § 3843), and, it not appearing that this was waived, it was error to place the defendant upon trial in the circuit Court without it; Perry v. State, 81 So. 858, 17 Ala. App. 80, and cases therein cited.

We do not think it was error to overrule appellant’s motion for a new trial on any of the grounds therein set forth. This will sufficiently indicate the views of the court to render it unnecessary to pass upon the other questions presented,, which, indeed, may not arise upon another trial. For the error *260 pointed ont, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 So. 224, 21 Ala. App. 259, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckee-v-state-alactapp-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack