McKee v. Sithe Independence Power Partners

281 A.D.2d 891, 722 N.Y.S.2d 195, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2690
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 21, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 281 A.D.2d 891 (McKee v. Sithe Independence Power Partners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKee v. Sithe Independence Power Partners, 281 A.D.2d 891, 722 N.Y.S.2d 195, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2690 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in extinguishing the lien of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty Mutual), the workers’ compensation carrier, on the damages awarded to petitioners in their underlying third-party action (see, Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 [1]). Petitioners alleged that Liberty Mutual’s share of the litigation expenses and the future benefits extinguished by the judgment in the underlying action (see, Matter of Kelly v State Ins. Fund, 60 NY2d 131) exceeded the amount of the lien, and thus the lien should be extinguished. We disagree. Petitioner Thomas McKee was not receiving ongoing compensation for a total disability or scheduled loss of use. Liberty Mutual’s obligation to pay future benefits therefore cannot be quantified “by actuarial or other reliable means” (Matter of Briggs v Kansas City Fire & Mar. Ins. Co., 121 AD2d 810, 812; cf., Matter of Kelly v State Ins. Fund, supra), and the present value of the estimated future compensation payments that Liberty Mutual would have become obligated to make cannot be ascertained (see, Matter of Briggs v Kansas City Fire & Mar. Ins. Co., supra, at 811-812). We therefore reverse the order and remit the matter to Supreme Court to determine the amount recoverable by Liberty Mutual. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Nicholson, J. — Lien.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Hayes, Burns and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stenson v. New York State Department of Transportation
84 A.D.3d 22 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Bissell v. Town of Amherst
79 A.D.3d 1638 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Scheer v. New York State Insurance Fund
22 Misc. 3d 239 (New York Supreme Court, 2008)
Burns v. Varriale
879 N.E.2d 140 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
Burns v. Varriale
34 A.D.3d 59 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
McComber v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc.
28 A.D.3d 402 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Donaldson v. Ryder Truck Rental & Leasing
189 Misc. 2d 750 (New York Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D.2d 891, 722 N.Y.S.2d 195, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckee-v-sithe-independence-power-partners-nyappdiv-2001.