McKee v. Sanford
25 Pa. 105
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The decision of the District Court on an application to open a judgment by confession, is not the subject of revision here. We have no authority to interfere in such cases, and the parties cannot give us, by consent, a jurisdiction which the law has not conferred. An agreement on the facts, with a provision for a writ of error, does not give us jurisdiction to review [106]*106the decision of questions which the law places under the discretion of the courts of original jurisdiction.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McKee v. Sanford, 25 Pa. 105 (Pa. 1855).
25 Pa. 105 (McKee v. Sanford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wood v. Harlan
78 Pa. Super. 92 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Welscher's Estate
3 Walker 241 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1880)