McKee v. Cincinnati Traction Co.
9 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 173, 1907 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 201
This text of 9 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 173 (McKee v. Cincinnati Traction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McKee v. Cincinnati Traction Co., 9 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 173, 1907 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 201 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1907).
Opinion
I dissent from the views expressed by 'Judge G-iffen and am of the opinion that the question should have been submitted' to the jury, whether or not the opening was in the circumstances so obvious that Nellie McKee in the ordinary exercise of her faculties could have known of the same.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 173, 1907 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckee-v-cincinnati-traction-co-ohcircthamilton-1907.